Like all artistic genres, containment fiction and liminal fiction can be divided into stages of development, or large movements, here in terms of “waves”. Each wave is seen as a reaction to the previous, and is often in opposition to the goals and ideals of those that came before them.
Theory
The theory of embryological stages to an art genre is based on the empirical and anecdotal observation across a multitude of art forms and genres through time. No definitive citation can be provided in justification for this theoretical framework. We can however, observe the words of others who have organized the development of genres in this way, and determine the theory’s success in its subsequent application.
A suitable nomenclature for archaeological minds in the study of containment fiction might be borrowed from author and musicologist Andrew Hickey:[1]https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-627.57-627.862
“There’s a cycle that all popular genres in any art-forms seem to go through – they start off as super-simplistic, discarding all the frippery of whatever previous genre was currently disappearing up itself, and prizing simplicity, self-expression, and the idea that anyone can create art. [First wave.] They then get a second generation who want to do more sophisticated, interesting, things. [Second wave.] And then you get a couple of things happening at once — you get a group of people who move even further on from the “sophisticated” work, and who create art that’s even more intellectually complex and which only appeals to people who have a lot of time to study the work intensely (this is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is a thing) and another group whose reaction is to say “let’s go back to the simple original style”. [Third wave.] We’ll see this playing out in rock music over the course of the seventies, in particular, but in the fifties it was happening in jazz.”
This framework of embryology in containment fiction can be seen on the scale of the genre as a whole, as well as within individual communities. Their tempo may occur on the order of years or months, depending on the idiosynracies of the genre and communities involved. For example, the SCP Wiki saw its transition from first wave to second over the course of years, while The Backrooms has arguably experienced this in a matter of months.
Liminal fiction does not fit this paradigm of organization, and thus would not be considered a “wave” of containment fiction. It is rather a second generation of the subgenre; the stylistic gap between it and containment fiction is equivalent to the gap between proto-containment fiction (The Holders) and SCP. The embryological phases therefore apply equally to liminal fiction itself, which can be interchangeable with containment fiction in the following schematic.
First Wave
First wave containment fiction has largely taken place on 4chan and in the initial years/phases of community migrations to other platforms. It is marked by high potential energy, concentrated and rapid pioneering of a conceptual direction, accelerated local adoption, lax standards, and an emphasis on unconstrained creativity. First wave is pivotal in establishing base characteristics for the upcoming genre, and though it lacks the sophistication and polish of subsequent waves, the crudeness and liberty is often necessary in order to find and establish a lasting direction for future, more directed growth.
Examples:
• 4chan message boards (/x/)
• Non-dedicated social media platforms (r/nosleep, r/backrooms)
• EditThis (SCP)
• Series 1 (SCP)
• Backrooms Fandom
• Early Backrooms Wikidot (pre-winter 2020)
Second Wave
Second wave containment fiction takes the relatively thin predicate of first wave and adds more sophisticated literary instruments, such as narrative, lore & continuity, characterization, tropes (which it may establish if sufficiently novel), and format-wide developments. Second wave is also the phase of genre and community identity, as well as larger, more global adoption.
Standards are tightened in second wave, and allow for a stricter range of baseline acceptable content with regards to format and required components. Critique and hyper-analysis is often emphasized to sustain the quality achieved by and within the second wave. Second wave often entails discord between proponents or beneficiaries of first wave material, or alternative-direction second order waves, which can be lasting, or become divisions along community lines.
Prolonged stages of second wave — dubbed “sustained” second wave, or “latter” second wave — may see abstraction of a genre and/or community’s established identity in the pursuit of increased quality (as defined in traditional, industry-standardized terms), or due to extra-curricular societal/political sensibilities. As Andrew Hickey writes:[2]https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-627.492-627.716
“…you get a group of people who move even further on from the “sophisticated” work, and who create art that’s even more intellectually complex and which only appeals to people who have a lot of time to study the work intensely (this is not necessarily a bad thing, but it is a thing).”
A example hallmark mantra of latter second wave in containment fiction is the “anomaly as a narrative vehicle”, or “canvas” treatment, with the emphasis being the story the anomaly enables and/or introduces, rather than any focus on the anomalous object, location, or phenomenon itself.
Examples:
• Series 2/3-current (SCP)
• Backrooms Wiki (Spring 2021-current)
• Wayward (second wave variant)
• Liminal Archives (second wave variant)
• SCP Commune (second wave variant)
Third Wave
Third wave attempts to re-harness the potential energy, ideals, and relative simplicity from first wave while blending them with the increased sophistication and standards of second wave. It is often a reactionary force to second wave, particularly latter second wave, and may exist simultaneously, whether harmoniously or competitively. Third wave is “… another group whose reaction is to say ‘let’s go back to the simple original style’.”[3]https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-627.436-627.862
Third wave proponents tend to believe that the identity of a given genre or community may have become too complicated stylistically and/or socially, too populated by user influx to maintain adequate standards, and/or too gentrified or commercialized as a result of increased or prolonged mainstream awareness. Typically, third wave seeks to remove elements seen as responsible for diluting the founding principles of a genre.[4]https://www.conficmagazine.com/post/we-re-not-scp[5]https://lackoflepers.medium.com/as-an-adolescent-scp-has-lost-the-plot-c5b32668d1e0[6]https://lackoflepers.medium.com/confic-opinion-a-return-to-innocence-at-the-height-of-gluttony-in-containment-fiction-e4ef530a31cd[7]https://lackoflepers.medium.com/how-scp-went-mad-with-ego-chose-craft-over-art-is-in-a-spiritual-dark-age-of-madness-1c70227c7ef6[8]https://archive.ph/5iNHn#selection-449.0-449.133
Third wave faces the challenge of re-defining the genre, sometimes without the benefit of pre-exiting second wave longevity, popularity, sophistication, or wider community approval. It may be bolstered by the second wave’s network effects (Lindy effects), or discouraged by these in equal proportion, depending upon the sociological/artistic dynamics between representative groups. If successful, a third wave may become a relative first wave in its own right.
As Andrew Hickey writes of third wave jazz music in the American 1950’s:[9]https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-631.0-646.0
“As artists like John Coltrane, Eric Dolphy, Thelonius Monk and Charles Mingus were busy pushing the form to its harmonic limits, going for ever-more-complex music, there was a countermovement to create simpler, more blues-based music. In the US, this mostly took the form of rhythm and blues, but there was also a whole movement of youngish men who went looking for the obscure heroes of previous generations of jazz and blues music, and brought them out of obscurity.In the UK, there were a lot of musicians… who idolised the music made in New Orleans in the 1920s. These people — people like Humphrey Lyttleton, Chris Barber, George Melly, Ken Colyer, and Acker Bilk — thought not only that bebop and modern jazz were too intellectual, but many of them thought that even the Kansas City jazz of the 1930s which had led to swing — the music of people like Count Basie or Jesse Stone — was too far from the true great music, which was the 1920s hot Dixieland jazz of people like King Oliver, Sidney Bechet, and Louis Armstrong. Any jazz since then was suspect, and they set out to recreate that 1920s music as accurately as they could. They were playing traditional jazz – or trad, as it was known.These rather earnest young men were very much the same kind of people as those who would, ten years later, form bands like the Rolling Stones, the Yardbirds, and the Animals, and they saw themselves as scholars as much as those later musicians did. They were looking at the history, and trying to figure out how to recapture the work of other people. They were working for cultural preservation, not to create new music themselves as such — although many of them became important musicians in their own right.”
Examples:
• RPC Authority
• Timeless Places
• AOEL Society / AOE
References
↑1 | https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-627.57-627.862 |
---|---|
↑2 | https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-627.492-627.716 |
↑3 | https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-627.436-627.862 |
↑4 | https://www.conficmagazine.com/post/we-re-not-scp |
↑5 | https://lackoflepers.medium.com/as-an-adolescent-scp-has-lost-the-plot-c5b32668d1e0 |
↑6 | https://lackoflepers.medium.com/confic-opinion-a-return-to-innocence-at-the-height-of-gluttony-in-containment-fiction-e4ef530a31cd |
↑7 | https://lackoflepers.medium.com/how-scp-went-mad-with-ego-chose-craft-over-art-is-in-a-spiritual-dark-age-of-madness-1c70227c7ef6 |
↑8 | https://archive.ph/5iNHn#selection-449.0-449.133 |
↑9 | https://archive.ph/VKfMy#selection-631.0-646.0 |